Search Results

In Company Training The Incoterms® 2020 provide clarity and certainty to your company. In practice, however, there appear to be questions about the way in which the Incoterms® rules relate to transport, customs, insurance, payment arrangements and also the internal procedures and agreements within the company. How does your company make optimal use of the latest version of the Incoterms® rules? What is the right application for your business? Legitimate questions to which the In Company training provides answers. Why In-Company-Training With ICC's Incoterms® 2020 In Company training, you will be well prepared. Based on experience, we know that it is very useful to coordinate the training between the different departments, such as sales, marketing, finance, transport, compliance/legal and service. The added value of this means that your colleagues will be able to use the Incoterms® rules in a smarter way from now on. A group of employees from your company receive the same training, which is nice. The effect of this is reflected in practice, as well as the way in which departments work together. The In Company training offers the opportunity to reflect on the specific questions of the different departments within your company and also deals with the challenges that arise in your sector. Based on a telephone intake, the training is tailor-made. Based on this, the participants fill in a questionnaire so that the training can be further tailored to your wishes. The actual content and emphases will of course be determined in consultation. The size of the group is usually 10 to 15 people. The training is given in Dutch or English. Tailor-made for your business All colleagues trained in the same way ICC Certificate after completion for each participant Attractive price per participant Also suitable for larger groups No travel time or travel costs for the participants First-hand knowledge ICC Nederland now also offers online In Company training courses on the Incoterms® 2020 rules, in Dutch and in English. The aim of the online training is to gain more internal support and understanding for the Incoterms® 2020 rules that your company works with and to increase the basic knowledge about the ICC Incoterms® 2020 among your employees in order to facilitate daily use. Based on experience, we know that it is very useful to coordinate the training between the different departments, such as sales, marketing, finance, logistics, transport, compliance and legal. For more information, please contact ICC Netherlands via info@icc.nl Contact Us

< Back ICC Secretary General John Denton’s open letter to trade ministers ahead of MC13 WBO Feb 21, 2024 ICC Secretary General John W.H. Denton AO has issued a letter to trade ministers urging them to make every possible effort to ensure that the World Trade Organization’s 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) delivers tangible outcomes to bolster the multilateral trading system. The WTO’s 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) is taking place on 26-29 February 2024 in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Ministers from across the world will attend to review the functioning of the multilateral trading system and to take action on the future work of the WTO. In his letter, Mr. Denton warns that the gradual erosion of the WTO and the proliferation of unilateral and protectionist trade measures are weakening economic resiliency, inhibiting job creation, and exacerbating inequality. He warns that the WTO system should not be taken for granted – multilateral trade rules are not only a driver of economic growth and development but also an essential safety net. Emphasising the global business community’s steadfast support for the multilateral trading system, Mr. Denton stresses the need to see outcomes at MC13 in three key areas: Strengthening the WTO – we are urging WTO members to reaffirm their commitment to the foundational principles of the WTO, align behind a holistic vision for reform covering all three pillars of the organisation – negotiating, monitoring and deliberation, and dispute settlement – and agree on a tangible work programme for reform. Renewing the WTO E-Commerce Moratorium, a key safeguard for small businesses across the world, and introducing much needed ambitious digital trade disciplines at the WTO, including on data flows and localisation Accelerating the discussions on trade and environmental sustainability to eliminate growing trade frictions arising from the proliferation of national sustainability policies. Read ICC Secretary General John Denton’s open letter to trade ministers ahead of MC13 Previous Next

< Back Professor Dr Henricus J. Snijders Snijders Law and Leiden University Arbitrator Contact Details Netherlands +31 (0)64 828 0773 law@hjsnijders.com Additional Links: Link Contact Details Biography Professor Dr Henricus Joseph (Henk) Snijders is an Emeritus Professor of Civil Law and Civil Procedure, with a distinguished career in academia and legal practice. Prof. Snijders serves as an arbitrator for prestigious institutions including the Netherlands Arbitration Institute (NAI) and the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). He is also a legal advisor and legal expert, often issuing legal opinions in both state court and arbitral procedures. He represents the Netherlands in the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) and in particular Working Group IDR of this commission. He is deeply involved in legal scholarship as an author and editor of numerous books and articles, and he holds key editorial roles in several legal publications. He is a chairman and board member of various legal and academic organizations, contributing to the development and regulation of civil law and arbitration practices. His previous positions include lawyer and barrister at the Dutch Supreme Court, Professor at Erasmus University Rotterdam and Leiden University, Scientific Director of the Leiden Institute of Private Law, deputy judge at the District Court of The Hague and deputy judge of the Court of Appeal at Arnhem, member of the Working Group for the revision of the Dutch Arbitration Act 1986 and chairman of the Advisory Board of the Netherlands Arbitration Institute. Prof. Snijders' contributions to legal scholarship and practice are complemented by his roles as a patron and board member of multiple legal associations and his continued engagement in teaching and course coordination especially in the field of arbitration. In his spare time, he enjoys playing the violin and traveling. Languages Spoken Dutch, English, German, French Specialisation Arbitration Law, Civil Procedures, Contracts, Property Law, Tort Law Bar Admission(s) Credentials CV

< Back Study shows WTO collapse could slash exports of developing countries by 33% ICC WBO Apr 17, 2024 New economic modelling shows developing economies would see significant long-term trade reductions without the safety-net of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Key findings : A 33% drop in developing countries’ merchandise trade relative to a baseline scenario with the multilateral system still in place A permanent GDP loss to developing countries of over 5% – driven in part by a 5% decline in foreign direct investment flows Acute export losses of 43% in low-income economies and 32% in middle-income countries At a regional level, significant export reductions in Sub-Saharan African (42%) and South Asia (41%). A new study commissioned by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and conducted by Oxford Economics analyses the potential long-term structural impacts of WTO dissolution on developing economies and unequivocally demonstrates the vital importance of the WTO in fostering global economic growth and development. The demise of the rules-based multilateral trading system would result in greater uncertainty and higher information costs for all developing countries – and a 33% decline in global trade in goods , comparing to a baseline where the “status quo” of the rules-based multilateral trading system remains intact. Least developed economies would see export declines of 43% without the essential safety net provided by multilateral trade rules (also compared to this baseline). The impacts of WTO dissolution would gradually intensify over time, with the full impact peaking by 2030 and remaining permanent. Such a scenario would have devastating implications for global development and – at a human level – lives and livelihoods across the developing world. The assumptions underlying our modelling may be viewed as conservative, involving a gradual erosion of trust that eventually results in a breakdown of members’ commitments to the rules-based system. This results in greater uncertainty, higher information costs for all countries and increased levels of protectionism between country pairs without pre-existing free trade agreements in place. But we do not assume that all the benefits associated with the WTO would be destroyed – the world is now so closely integrated through global value chains that incentives to adopt protectionist policies are permanently reduced. Yet, even under a conservative “best case” scenario, developing economies would be severely disadvantaged by the erosion of the multilateral trading system. The findings of this first-of-its-kind analysis underscore the fundamental development safety-net provided by the WTO. ICC Secretary General John W.H. Denton AO said: “This study shows what is ultimately at stake – if the international community is serious about promoting global sustainable development, we must stop any further erosion of WTO rules and strengthen the multilateral system through successful reform of the organisation. It is high time to move beyond national positions and collaborate in our shared global interest.” One of the lead authors of the study, Lloyd Barton, Head of Thematic Macro Consulting at Oxford Economics, said: “The rules-based multilateral trade system has existed for so long that companies and consumers largely now take it for granted. But these rules are crucial to securing confidence in a stable and predictable trading environment. Our modelling of the long-term economic impact of potentially abandoning the WTO highlights the organisation’s importance for supporting trade as a critical enabler of growth in developing nations.” Find more: 2024-The-impact-on-developing-economies-of-WTO-dissolution-Briefing-for-policymakers.pdf ( iccwbo.org ) Previous Next

ENVIRONMENT & ENERGY COMMISSION The Commission contributes to international climate policymaking and the international debate on the development of coherent policy frameworks, solutions and tools to address the triple planetary crisis of climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution. Discover the Commission's Key Initiatives Climate Action Discover Biodiversity Discover Plastic Pollution Discover Making Climate Action Everyone’s Business Key dates 2024 26 Feb -1 March 6th Session of the United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA 6) Nairobi, Kenya 21-30 April 4th Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee Meeting (INC4) on plastic pollution Ottawa, Canada 3-13 June Bonn, Germany UNFCCC Intersessional Meetings 13-15 June G7 Summit 2024 Puglia, Italy 10-24 September UN General Assembly New York, USA 22-23 September Summit of the Future New York, USA 21 Oct –1 Nov COP16 Convention on Biological Diversity Colombia (TBC) 11- 22 November COP29 Baku, Azerbaijan 18-19 November G20 Summit 2024 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 25 Nov – 1 Dec 5th Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee Meeting (INC5) on plastic pollution Busan, Republic of Korea ICC at COP28: the voice of the real economy ICC – as the voice of the real economy in the UN climate process -- engaged prominently on the high-stake issues for business at COP28 in Dubai, in particular: an ambitious response to the first Global Stocktake, fulfilment of the annual US$100 billion climate finance promise for developing countries and setting the basis for a more ambitious post-2025 collective climate finance goal , as well as the successful operationalisation of Article 6 of the Paris agreement on international carbon markets. ICC issued this statement upon conclusion of COP28 on 13 December 2023. Please also refer to the summary of key negotiating outcomes and achievements. An online event to discuss and assess results from Dubai together with lead negotiators and business leaders will take place in early 2024 and more information will be shared in due course. ICC presence at COP28 For the second time, we hosted a central business pavilion in the COP28 Blue-zone. This year, ICC had a 600m2 footprint, the ICC’s largest presence to date. The space consisted of three venues in the COP28 Blue Zone: Chez ICC , a dedicated space for networking, business briefings and events from ICC, our National Committees, and partners. The Trade House – a collaboration between ICC, the International Trade Center, the UN Conference on Trade and Development and the World Trade Organisation – to highlight the role that trade can play in advancing climate action. The ICC Partner Stage , a dedicated pavilion enabling members of the UNFCCC Business and Industry NGOs Constituency to share their expertise. These spaces served as hubs for critical knowledge sharing, networking and coordination among private sector representatives, and also helped to bridge the gap with other stakeholders in governments and international organizations, creating new pathways for public-private partnerships. Once again, we also hosted the ICC virtual conference "Make Climate Action Everyone’s Business Forum", featuring livestreams of pavilion events and external events from global partners. Now in its third year, the Forum has reached thousands of participants in more than 160 countries, providing a platform for more than 200 organizations’ sessions. Trade Day Collaboration For the first time, trade was included in the official COP programming with the first-ever Trade Day coinciding with Finance Day on 4 December, marking a significant moment when the trade community and climate policy ecosystem converge. Sustainable development is at the heart of the multilateral trading system and trade emerges as a key player to unlock climate-smart growth. In addition to our collaboration for the Trade House, ICC also had the privilege of shaping the Trade Day programming together with the UAE Presidency, WTO, UNCTAD and ITC, and hosted two high-level events on sustainable trade finance and MSME climate action. ICC Secretary General, John Denton, participated in the Trade Day opening session. Recent publications Principles and proposals for effective carbon pricing 4 December 2023 Since 2021, ICC has drawn on the experience of its global members to develop core principles and guidance for the effective design of carbon pricing instruments. In this third report, building on our past work, ICC provides guidance to governments and policymakers to address carbon leakage, promote linkage for greater international cooperation and make carbon pricing systems more efficient. Learn more Download Path for Growth: Making Sustainability Reporting work for SMEs 23 November 2023 A pioneering report aimed at ensuring that environmental reporting ultimately helps empower SMEs towards ever more ambitious climate and environmental action. Download ICC Principles for Sustainable Trade 4 December 2023 ICC has published its ICC Principles for Sustainable Trade: Wave 2, which provides a frame to assess both the environmental sustainability of a transaction, and how it supports socio-economically sustainable development. It is designed to support business in meeting both the Paris Agreement objective of limiting global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Learn more Download How competition policy acts as a barrier to climate action 27 November 2023 In 2022, ICC called on governments, legislators and competition authorities to maximise efforts in aligning competition policies with global sustainability goals. While barriers to business collaboration in the fight against climate change persist in 2023, the tide is slowly turning. A new ICC progress report presents a snapshot of key developments in the antitrust competition space and concludes: more can and needs to be done. Learn more Download Making Action on Biodiversity Everyone’s Business The aims of the ICC Working Group on Biodiversity are to raise awareness of the importance of the biodiversity agenda across the business community and support all companies towards improving their biodiversity impact. Having initially monitored and provided input to the COP15 process through submissions and exchanges with negotiators; in 2023 the working group has since been helping members to better understand the quickly evolving biodiversity landscape by sharing information and organizing sessions with initiatives like the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD). We also provided input to the Business for Nature Guidance on Target 15, as well as supported the It’s Now for Nature campaign . Combating Plastic Pollution ICC continued to engage in the UN process to develop an ambitious and effective legally binding instrument to end plastic pollution by 2024. Under the auspices of the dedicated working group, ICC provided input on potential elements towards an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, as well as an ICC response to the initial options paper released in advance of the second session of the intergovernmental negotiating committee meeting (INC-2) held in Paris on 29 May – 2 June. On this occasion, ICC hosted a breakfast roundtable with representatives from UNEP, government and high-level business executives of leading businesses across the value chain of plastics. ICC subsequently provided input to the call for submissions on scope and intersessional work. ICC also participated in the third Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee meeting (INC-3) held in Nairobi from 11-19 November and developed an ICC response to the zero draft of the treaty released in advance of INC-3. We reiterated the need for a workable and effective legally binding instrument with global rules that would help guide and enable businesses to become positive actors in transitioning to a circular economy for plastics, emphasizing the need to take into account the special circumstances of SMEs.

< Back Promoting Ethical Business Practices: Insights from International Commission Discussions ICC NL Feb 16, 2024 In an era marked by heightened scrutiny and evolving regulatory landscapes, maintaining ethical business practices is essential for organizations worldwide. During the last International Anti-corruption, Human Rights, and Corporate Governance commission, key aspects were presented and discussed in depth by the experts present. This article highlights some of the key aspects of these discussions. From cultivating a culture of integrity to addressing human rights concerns in the digital age, each discussion delved into practical strategies and considerations to promote international trade while ensuring sustainable growth. By embracing simplicity, transparency, and collaboration, businesses can navigate complexities while fostering trust and accountability in their operations, ultimately contributing to a more ethical and prosperous future for all stakeholders. 1. A pragmatic approach to Business Integrity. ICC is synonym of neutrality, this is also the case in its new guidance on combating corruption. Not calling specific laws, but creating simple, easy to use tools to support organisations that want to do business with integrity. Some of the key principles of the new guidelines are: - Cultivating a Culture of Compliance True compliance begins with fostering psychological safety rather than relying solely on procedural frameworks. Embracing open dialogue, even provocatively, such as through roundtable discussions facilitated by ICC, is crucial for nurturing this culture. The ICC rules serve as foundational principles applicable to organizations of all sizes, particularly beneficial for those lacking dedicated compliance teams. A robust compliance program commences with comprehensive risk assessment and awareness initiatives. Providing employees with adequate training to grasp the significance of rules and contractual clauses is essential. - Encouraging Speaking Up Demonstrating the value of speaking up is paramount. Implementation and communication of lessons learned not only showcase commitment but also serve as a catalyst for success. Transparency in addressing issues is vital; organizations without visible concerns often raise suspicions. Efforts should be made to minimize the tendency to hide and cut communication when a complaint arise, ensuring a balanced approach. Reports often reach untrained line managers, leading to silence, flawed investigations, and inaction, ultimately undermining the reporting system. Emphasizing the importance of reporting basic information and the subsequent mediation or solutions implemented is essential to foster best practices and organizational growth. - Transcending Departmental Silos Avoid confining reporting solely to the compliance department, as this may lead to preaching to the converted. Instead, make Integrity everyone’s business and encourage all levels of the organization by facilitating comprehensive awareness and action. 2. Responsible Market Disengagement Market disengagement is a painful decision that necessitates a thoughtful and responsible approach to uphold ethical standards and mitigate adverse impacts on stakeholders. Trade plays a pivotal role in driving societal change, underlining the importance of remaining engaged in sensitive markets. However, strategic, politic or economic considerations can lead to a necessary exit of a market. In this case, prioritizing ethical and humanitarian concerns is key. ICC is developing a framework that will facilitates responsible disengagement, ensuring a seamless transition while minimizing adverse impacts on communities. By taking into account the broader societal implications, organizations can reach people that are often left behind and difficult to identify. Responsible disengagement will enhance future reentry prospects. Adopting a holistic supply chain perspective is paramount, accounting for not only the financial costs incurred by companies but also the broader societal and environmental impacts. These considerations extend beyond monetary concerns, encompassing the intricate human dimensions that are often challenging to quantify but profoundly significant in ethical decision-making. 3. Supply chain responsibility The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) marks a pivotal shift towards addressing social and environmental concerns within supply chains. Upon adoption, a two-year transposition period ensues, with Q2 2026 as the best-case scenario for implementation. Enforcement mechanisms are stringent, featuring substantial fines and liabilities for adverse impacts. Notably, director duties are excluded from this new version, focusing instead on upstream and end-of-life responsibilities rather than sales activities. There is a clear overlap between the CSDD and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), so elements already have to be implemented by large corporates. Despite concerns, it's crucial to note that the CSDD isn't driven by an anti-business agenda from the EU; rather, it stands as a beneficial initiative aimed at enhancing good corporate practices for the greater good of both companies and society. 4. Human Rights in the realm of Artificial Intelligence The United Nations has embarked on a decade-long process to draft a mandatory treaty on human rights and Artificial Intelligence, with robust representation from the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). Under the stewardship of the High Commissioner, Lene Wendland, this initiative aims to address pressing human rights challenges in the digital era. A significant project emerging from the UN is B-Tech (Business Human Rights in Technologies), focusing on the ethical use of technology and its potential impact on human rights. By examining downstream effects, particularly in terms of privacy rights and freedom of expression, B-Tech seeks to ensure that technological advancements uphold fundamental human rights principles. Emphasizing the right to privacy and freedom of expression, B-Tech's work aligns with broader initiatives such as those facilitated by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Through platforms like oecd.ai , stakeholders can engage in discussions and initiatives aimed at safeguarding human rights in the digital landscape. 5. The World Bank, multilateral cooperation in combatting corruption Integrity and compliance stand as cornerstone priorities for the World Bank, with a dedicated focus on entities prohibited from conducting business with the institution, overseen by the Integrity Compliance Office. To foster a culture of accountability and transparency, it's imperative to transition from a "speak up" to a "listen up" mindset, encouraging dialogue and demonstrating unwavering commitment. This approach seamlessly aligns with the efforts of ICC Netherlands and the Week of Integrity , emphasizing transparency in reporting as a vital component. Protection for whistleblowers is paramount to ensure a safe reporting environment. Discussions underscored the necessity for businesses to take ownership of compliance, moving beyond periodic audits to assume responsibility for their supply chains. Effective communication between companies and governments is essential to align interests and address integrity risks collaboratively. Integrity should be approached from a risk-based perspective, recognizing that isolated incidents rather than systemic issues often drive breaches. Companies demonstrating transparency and proactive issue resolution should be prioritized over punitive measures. Simplicity is key in establishing business rules: avoid bribery and emphasize reporting, while the rest remains grounded in risk assessment. This ethos, aligned with SDG 16 and the UN Global Compact, particularly benefits SMEs by streamlining compliance efforts. Supply chain due diligence and human rights have long been risk factors for companies, often relegated to the back burner due to complexity. Organizations must adopt an integrated approach to due diligence, focusing on proactive identification and resolution of issues rather than mere avoidance. With evolving regulations, especially in the EU, consumer and NGO expectations are high, necessitating a risk-based approach tailored to each organization's capabilities. ICC's expertise in ex ante risk mitigation, honed over a century, remains instrumental in facilitating international trade while ensuring ethical business practices. Multilateral cooperation is paramount in the fight against corruption. Organizations like the OECD and the ICC collaborate to promote integrity and compliance globally, leveraging peer pressure and shared learning to combat corrupt practices. By uniting in this endeavor, businesses can uphold ethical standards across borders. In conclusion, ethical business practices form the foundation of sustainable trade. By embracing simplicity, transparency, and collaboration, organizations can navigate the complexities of compliance while upholding their commitment to integrity and responsibility. As businesses strive to meet evolving regulatory expectations and societal demands, ethical conduct must remain at the forefront of their operations. By adhering to ethical principles, businesses can not only ensure compliance but also contribute to a more ethical and prosperous future for all stakeholders. Previous Next

Unlock the Power of Business-to-Business Mediation Webinar - October 2024

Dispute resolution With unmatched levels of excellence in arbitration and ADR services, we facilitate the prevention and resolution of disputes for companies, states and individuals, making business work for everyone, every day, everywhere. Leading Dispute Resolution worldwide In an increasingly tumultuous trade environment where access to justice and the rule of law are key to ensuring business continuity, ICC Dispute Resolution Services (DSR) facilitate the resolution of commercial disputes with unmatched levels of service. ICC DRS offers a range of services to promote the continuity of global trade by helping commercial parties avoid, manage and resolve their disputes efficiently. Dispute Resolution Services, including ICC Arbitration and dispute avoidance tools, ensure that when disputes arise, they are resolved quickly and efficiently. This allows parties to focus on their core business priorities with complete peace of mind, thanks to cost and process transparency, security and confidentiality. How DRS works To resolve disputes effectively and efficiently, businesses need a fair process and equal access to justice. Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms give parties fast, predictable, cost effective and efficient access to justice which is why businesses include arbitration and ADR clauses in their commercial contracts. ICC DRS offers a wide choice of customisable services for every stage of a dispute, from the services offered by the ICC International Centre for ADR (mediation, experts, dispute boards and docdex) to ICC Arbitration, delivered by the most trusted institution worldwide: the ICC International Court of Arbitration . ICC’s range of administered procedures can be used separately, successively or even concurrently as an alternative to litigation for resolving domestic and international disputes. ICC Arbitration is a process guided by the ICC Rules of Arbitration . ICC’s globally accessible and completely neutral services are available to anyone, from individuals and private sector enterprises to states and state entities. Anyone can benefit from ICC Arbitration’s flexibility and effectiveness. The only requirement for a party to be able to benefit from ICC Arbitration is to consent to its use in a contract, treaty or separate arbitration agreement. This is usually provided for before a dispute arises, but may also occur after the dispute has taken place. The International Court of Arbitration is the world’s leading arbitral institution. Since 1923, ICC has been helping to resolve disputes in international commercial and investment disputes. Unrivalled in experience and expertise, the ICC Court and its Secretariat are always ready to assist parties and arbitral tribunals with any questions relating to the conduct of the arbitration and strive to ensure ICC awards are enforceable. The Court’s Secretariat, with over 100 lawyers and support personnel, operating through offices in Paris, Hong Kong, New York, Singapore, Sao Paolo, and Abu Dhabi administers cases in any chosen language. It continuously seeks to improve efficiency, control time and costs, and aid enforcement by introducing innovative new arbitration tools and procedures. This ongoing focus makes certain that ICC is always in touch with the concerns and interests of trading partners throughout the world. Dispute Resolution Services When commercial disputes arise, ICC’s market-leading dispute resolution services can be relied on to resolve them as efficiently and economically as possible. DSR website > ICC Netherlands DRS Committee The Dutch Arbitration and DRS Committee consists of experts from corporate, law firm and organizational members of ICC Netherlands. DRS Commission> Arbitrator & ADR Database Access a comprehensive database of qualified arbitrators and ADR professionals connected with ICC Netherlands, tailored to meet your dispute resolution needs. ADR Database> Useful links ICC Rules of Arbitration Click here ICC Mediation Rules Click here Commission on Arbitration and ADR reports Click here ICC Dispute Resolution Library Click here ICC Dispute Resolution Bulletin Click here International Court of Arbitration The International Court of Arbitration® is the world’s leading arbitral institution. Since 1923, it has been helping to resolve difficulties in international commercial and business disputes to support trade and investment. The Court exercises judicial supervision of arbitration proceedings. Its purpose is to ensure proper application of the ICC Rules, as well as to assist parties and arbitrators in overcoming procedural obstacles. International Centre for ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) The ICC International Centre for ADR offers a range of services that can be used separately, successively or even concurrently. ADR services include mediation, expert appraisal, dispute boards and DOCDEX. All ICC amicable dispute resolution solutions give parties a procedural framework for settling matters quickly, cordially and in the most cost-effective way. International Centre for ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) In ad hoc cases, the arbitration will be administered by the arbitrators themselves. the parties may require the assistance of a state court or ICC as appointing authority to provide services such as the constitution of the arbitral tribunal. To provide this service, ICC applies a special set of rules: the Rules of ICC as Appointing Authority . They are designed for use in proceedings under UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules or other arbitration proceedings. Reach Out Do you have a question about Mediation, Arbitration or Dispute resolution? Fill-in this form or send an email to: info@icc.nl First name Last name Email Subject Leave us a message... Submit Thanks for submitting! Centenary of the ICC Court In 2023, we have celebrated 100 years of the ICC International Court of Arbitration®, the world’s leading arbitral institution. Since the inception of the ICC Court in 1923, we have remained at the forefront of supporting global trade and investment through dispute prevention and resolution. Dicover our dispute resolution journey

Coming Soon Sign up to be the first to know when we go live. Notify Me Thanks for submitting!

< Back New Dispute Resolution Governing Body Chair announced Arbitration & ADR May 3, 2024 ICC has announced a new chair and two new additions to its Governing Body for Dispute Resolution Services. Mohamed Salah Abdel Wahab (Egypt), Founding Partner and Head of International Arbitration at Zulficar & Partners Law Firm has become Chair of ICC’s Governing Body for Dispute Resolution Services, he was elected Vice-Chair in 2022. Mr Abdel Wahab replaces Michael McIlwrath (United States), Founder and CEO at MDisputes and former Vice-President of Litigation at Baker Hughes, who has stepped down upon conclusion of two successful terms. Two new members to the 16-member Governing Body were also announced during a virtual meeting of the Governing Body on 12 March. Anne Marie Whitesell (United States) and Tom Clark (Philippines) began their respective terms in March 2024, replacing outgoing members Pierrick Le Goff (France) and Maria Varsellona (Italy). Anne Marie Whitesell is Professor at the LL.M. Programme and Faculty Director for the Programme on International Arbitration and Dispute Resolution. She has acted as arbitrator and counsel in numerous international arbitration cases. From 2001 to 2007, she served as Secretary General of the ICC International Court of Arbitration. Ms Whitesell received her A.B. from Smith College, her J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law and her Doctorate in Law from the Université de Paris I, Panthéon-Sorbonne. She is admitted to the New York State Bar, the District of Columbia Bar and the US District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. Tom Clark holds a Doctor of Laws degree from Columbia University and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Government from Harvard University. He has over 30 years of experience in legal and government affairs practice, spanning the financial services, energy, and infrastructure sectors worldwide. Mr Clark worked for 22 years at the General Electric Company (GE), serving as General Counsel for GE’s largest Asian financial services arm and as Executive Counsel for Government Affairs and Policy. Currently, Mr Clark works as General Counsel at the Asian Development Bank, where he is responsible for driving legal strategy and engagement on regulatory and policy reforms. The ICC Governing Body for Dispute Resolution Services is a committee of the ICC Executive Board. Its mandate is to propose measures to ensure that ICC’s Dispute Resolution Services department achieves its principal activity and organisational objectives, including maintenance of a high-quality service to users, identification of areas for growth and preserving ICC’s reputation as the pre-eminent global institution for preventing and resolving disputes. More information is available here . View all members Previous Next

< Back Shaping tomorrow's trade at the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) ICC WBO Feb 22, 2024 As anticipation builds for the upcoming 13th Ministerial Conference in Abu Dhabi next week, the global stage is set for pivotal discussions that will shape the future of international trade. Among the pressing issues slated for deliberation is the fate of the World Trade Organization (WTO) moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions, poised to expire in February. The implications of its renewal or expiration loom large, particularly for the growing realms of e-commerce and digital trade. Recent engagements in Geneva, where ICC Secretary General John Denton and ICC Head of Trade Valerie Picard convened with key stakeholders including WTO Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala and prominent ambassadors, underscore the urgency and significance of preparations for MC13. With representatives from Australia, China, India, and the United States among others, the discussions resonated with a resounding message: the preservation of the WTO E-Commerce Moratorium is imperative, and MC13 must yield substantive outcomes to fortify the multilateral trading framework. Amidst escalating trade protectionism and geopolitical tensions, the WTO stands as a beacon of cooperation and stability, nearly three decades since its inception. Yet, the challenges confronting global commerce demand bold action. From revitalizing the WTO's foundational principles to spearheading reforms across its organizational pillars, there is a collective imperative to usher in an era of inclusive, resilient trade relations. This paper delineates five paramount areas identified by the global business community, derived from exhaustive consultations facilitated by the International Chamber of Commerce. With insights garnered from diverse industries and regions, these priorities encapsulate the collective aspirations for a more dynamic and equitable global trading landscape. 1. Put market access back on the agenda . Since the Covid-19 pandemic, trade restrictions, including subsidies, export controls and investment restrictions, have been proliferating on grounds of national security, resilience, domestic competitiveness and environmental concerns. On average, there were 4,409 new trade restrictions on goods, investments, and services per year between 2020-2023 , compared to an average of 2,845 new trade restrictions in the 2009-2019 period, representing an increase of 55%. As a result, trade is becoming more complex and costly for businesses. [1] Economic studies and history are unequivocal on the negative impacts of protectionism, and the WTO was designed to counter such measures. As stated in the preamble to the Marrakesh Agreement, “reciprocal and mutually advantageous arrangements”, reduction of tariffs and other barriers to trade, and the elimination of discriminatory treatment in trade relations, are the path to jobs and economic development. It is crucial that governments put market access back on the agenda – for companies, diversifying export markets is not a luxury, it is a matter of resiliency. We are therefore calling on all WTO members to reaffirm their commitment to the foundational principles of the WTO as laid out in the Marrakesh Agreement and in existing WTO agreements, including the Subsidies and Countervailing Measures Agreement. Consistent with these principles, WTO Members must uphold and build on existing trade rules and not weaken or retreat from longstanding commitments under current WTO agreements. As an immediate step in advancing open and transparent trade, we strongly encourage WTO members to quickly integrate the Investment Facilitation Agreement for Development into WTO architecture. 2. Agree on a holistic vision for WTO reform. The global business community places great importance on the WTO and the broader multilateral trading system. However, as is widely recognised, the WTO is in urgent need of reform. And its rules must be updated to ensure it continues to serve the needs of businesses—the ultimate end-users of the global trading system. Whilst WTO Members have been engaged in active discussions on various parts of reform, notably dispute settlement, reform efforts are not being approached holistically. But any chronic imbalance between the organisation’s three functions cannot be sustained — failings in one inevitably weaken the others. Any effort to reform the WTO must address all policy, legal, and architectural issues comprehensively. ICC has proposed a framework that sets out a holistic vision for reform of the WTO from the perspective of the global business community and maps out a comprehensive approach to reform across the three vital functions of the organisation, which would also include establishing a formal mechanism for private sector engagement in the work of the WTO at a technical level. While we welcome the WTO Director-General’s Business Advisory Group launched as part of a broader effort to engage stakeholders, the WTO must institute a permanent structural change to ensure business and other stakeholder voices are heard when shaping a long-lasting future for the multilateral trading system. We urge WTO members to align behind a holistic vision for reform covering all three pillars of the organisation – negotiations, dispute settlement and monitoring – and agree on a tangible work programme for reform. 3. Allow digital trade to thrive. The Moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions has enabled digital trade to flourish since 1998, preventing the imposition of burdensome tariffs and non-tariff barriers. It is high time for a permanent prohibition on customs duties on electronic transmissions. Building on this critical and fundamental safeguard, the global business community welcomes the substantive progress made by the WTO E-commerce Joint Statement Initiative on E-Commerce and for having reached consensus on several disciplines relating to digital trade facilitation. The task now is to integrate those disciplines into WTO architecture and accelerate progress and ensure a high standard outcome on other key provisions, including cross-border data flows and localisation. It is also imperative that the provisions apply to all sectors, including financial services. Common rules to ensure open, non-discriminatory access to digital and digitally enabled markets are the key to a successful future e-commerce agreement, as is increased market access in terms of increasing participation in and compliance with the Information Technology Agreement (ITA) I & II and launch of ITA III negotiations to help promote connectivity and bridge the digital divide. 4. Establish a formal roadmap to address specific issues on trade and environmental sustainability. Concerted and urgent action is needed to put the world back on a trajectory to limit global temperature increases to 1.5° Celsius but this will not happen through unilateral measures: coordination between governments to address barriers to the deployment of climate solutions and enhance the viability of investments in a net-zero future is critical. But instead, business is facing a cacophony of environmental rules, regulations and standards. In the case of carbon border adjustment measures business, we are witnessing the creation of multiple schemes in different jurisdictions, leading to administrative complexity, regulatory fragmentation and political tensions. ICC urges WTO members to establish a roadmap that would cover the entire range of environmental issues, which would serve as the basis for a work programme aimed at developing new or adapting the current rules and disciplines on trade and environmental sustainability, including addressing barriers to the circular economy. As part of this roadmap, it is critical that WTO Members discuss the trade related aspects of carbon border adjustment mechanisms and consider methods to develop a multilateral approach that meets climate goals without violating trade rules. And it is equally critical that WTO Members initiate without delay negotiations on environmental goods and services with a view to achieving ambitious outcomes by the end of 2024. 5. Accelerate full implementation of the Trade Facilitation Agreement. The WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) removes barriers which make it harder for businesses of all sizes to trade internationally but hurt small and medium-sized enterprises the most. By ratifying the agreement, countries committed to reducing red tape at borders – ranging from measures to ensure quicker release and clearance of goods to enhancing better cooperation between border agencies. The benefits of the agreement are indisputable – according to the WTO, in the first two years alone following its entry into force in 2017, international trade increased by US$ 231 billion. Yet too many countries still rely on outdated manual and inefficient procedures and require the assistance to implement the agreement in full. The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated that efficient, modern and digital border processes are an essential tool of supply chain resilience. ICC calls on all governments to prioritise implementation of the TFA and to provide all necessary support to developing countries through initiatives such as the Global Alliance for Trade Facilitation so that goods can cross borders without unnecessary delays or additional costs. [1] Global dynamics ( globaltradealert.org ) Previous Next

Become a member ICC is the world’s most networked business organisation reaching over 45 million companies in more than 170 countries – a total employment footprint of over 1 billion people. Joining ICC makes business sense. Become part of our network. What are the benefits of joining ICC? Amplify your profile Access to international decision makers and engage with global business leaders, experts, international institutions, national governments and wider stakeholders Influence the global priorities, rules and standards that shape the way we trade Broaden client networks Support your supply chains Develop your talent and drive innovation across your business Gather insight and intelligence Shape the outcome of government dialogues Members represent a broad cross-section of business activity, including manufacturing, trade, services, banking and law in more than 170 countries, ranging from the world’s largest companies to SMEs, business associations, banks, law firms, and local chambers of commerce. ICC’s network is unparalleled. It offers the privilege of being uniquely placed to understand the practical challenges faced by businesses of all sizes and speak on its behalf, with authority, to policymakers that determine decisions affecting how business operates on a day-to-day basis. With access to governments and international forums, ICC ensures the voice of our members is heard on all aspects of business including trade, investment, sustainability, taxation, competition law and intellectual property. Members of ICC are informed of what matters at an early stage and provided constructive guidance on how to engage in relevant policy discussions. They also play an active part in drawing up rules and guidelines that can help business reduce costs and uncertainties – on arbitration, international banking issues and commercial contracts. The diversity of our members is reflected in the solutions we deliver, combining global perspective with local expertise towards one core purpose: to enable business to secure peace, prosperity and opportunity for all. Why ICC? International status and scale of network Depth of knowledge and expertise on trade Neutral convener to bring all parties to the table to deliver solutions that work for everyone Close working relationships with government Global influence Policy innovator ICC in Numbers $280 bn cases per annum The ICC International Court of Arbitration, launched in 1923 provides a global mechanism to settle international disputes — 23,000 cases since 1923, $280 billion cases processed per annum $25 tn of world trade ICC rules underpin $25 trillion 2 000 business experts ICC policy forums bring together over 2,000 world business experts to develop positions, rules and standards. 60-80% of world trade ICC Digital Standards Initiative is the coordinating body for digitalising 60–80% of world trade by 2026 40% of global trade finance ICC Banking Commission is the global selfregulating body for global trade finance governing 40% of global trade finance